Reimagining our pandemic issues with the mindset of an engineer


The final 20 months turned each canine into an novice epidemiologist and statistician. In the meantime, a bunch of bona fide epidemiologists and statisticians got here to consider that pandemic issues may be extra successfully solved by adopting the mindset of an engineer: that’s, specializing in pragmatic problem-solving with an iterative, adaptive technique to make issues work.

In a current essay, “Accounting for uncertainty throughout a pandemic,” the researchers mirror on their roles throughout a public well being emergency and on how they might be higher ready for the following disaster. The reply, they write, could lie in reimagining epidemiology with extra of an engineering perspective and fewer of a “pure science” perspective.

Epidemiological analysis informs public well being coverage and its inherently utilized mandate for prevention and safety. However the suitable stability between pure analysis outcomes and pragmatic options proved alarmingly elusive in the course of the pandemic.

Now we have to make sensible selections, so how a lot does the uncertainty actually matter?

Seth Guikema

“I all the time imagined that in this sort of emergency, epidemiologists can be helpful folks,” Jon Zelner, a coauthor of the essay, says. “However our position has been extra complicated and extra poorly outlined than I had anticipated on the outset of the pandemic.” An infectious illness modeler and social epidemiologist on the College of Michigan, Zelner witnessed an “insane proliferation” of analysis papers, “many with little or no thought of what any of it actually meant when it comes to having a optimistic affect.”

“There have been plenty of missed alternatives,” Zelner says—brought on by lacking hyperlinks between the concepts and instruments epidemiologists proposed and the world they had been meant to assist.

Giving up on certainty

Coauthor Andrew Gelman, a statistician and political scientist at Columbia College, set out “the larger image” within the essay’s introduction. He likened the pandemic’s outbreak of novice epidemiologists to the best way battle makes each citizen into an novice geographer and tactician: “As an alternative of maps with coloured pins, we have now charts of publicity and loss of life counts; folks on the road argue about an infection fatality charges and herd immunity the best way they could have debated wartime methods and alliances previously.”

And together with all the info and public discourse—Are masks nonetheless vital? How lengthy will vaccine safety final?—got here the barrage of uncertainty.

In making an attempt to know what simply occurred and what went unsuitable, the researchers (who additionally included Ruth Etzioni on the College of Washington and Julien Riou on the College of Bern) carried out one thing of a reenactment. They examined the instruments used to deal with challenges similar to estimating the speed of transmission from individual to individual and the variety of instances circulating in a inhabitants at any given time. They assessed every part from knowledge assortment (the standard of knowledge and its interpretation had been arguably the largest challenges of the pandemic) to mannequin design to statistical evaluation, in addition to communication, decision-making, and belief. “Uncertainty is current at every step,” they wrote.

And but, Gelman says, the evaluation nonetheless “doesn’t fairly specific sufficient of the confusion I went by way of throughout these early months.”

One tactic towards all of the uncertainty is statistics. Gelman thinks of statistics as “mathematical engineering”—strategies and instruments which might be as a lot about measurement as discovery. The statistical sciences try and illuminate what’s occurring on the earth, with a highlight on variation and uncertainty. When new proof arrives, it ought to generate an iterative course of that regularly refines earlier data and hones certainty.

Good science is humble and able to refining itself within the face of uncertainty.

Marc Lipsitch

Susan Holmes, a statistician at Stanford who was not concerned on this analysis, additionally sees parallels with the engineering mindset. “An engineer is all the time updating their image,” she says—revising as new knowledge and instruments develop into out there. In tackling an issue, an engineer provides a first-order approximation (blurry), then a second-order approximation (extra targeted), and so forth.

Gelman, nonetheless, has beforehand warned that statistical science will be deployed as a machine for “laundering uncertainty”—intentionally or not, crappy (unsure) knowledge are rolled collectively and made to look convincing (sure). Statistics wielded towards uncertainties “are all too usually bought as a kind of alchemy that can rework these uncertainties into certainty.”

We witnessed this in the course of the pandemic. Drowning in upheaval and unknowns, epidemiologists and statisticians—novice and professional alike—grasped for one thing stable in making an attempt to remain afloat. However as Gelman factors out, wanting certainty throughout a pandemic is inappropriate and unrealistic. “Untimely certainty has been a part of the problem of choices within the pandemic,” he says. “This leaping round between uncertainty and certainty has induced quite a lot of issues.”

Letting go of the need for certainty will be liberating, he says. And this, partly, is the place the engineering perspective is available in.

A tinkering mindset

For Seth Guikema, co-director of the Middle for Danger Evaluation and Knowledgeable Choice Engineering on the College of Michigan (and a collaborator of Zelner’s on different tasks), a key side of the engineering strategy is diving into the uncertainty, analyzing the mess, after which taking a step again, with the attitude, “Now we have to make sensible selections, so how a lot does the uncertainty actually matter?” As a result of if there’s quite a lot of uncertainty—and if the uncertainty modifications what the optimum selections are, and even what the great selections are—then that’s vital to know, says Guikema. “But when it doesn’t actually have an effect on what my greatest selections are, then it’s much less important.”

For example, rising SARS-CoV-2 vaccination protection throughout the inhabitants is one state of affairs during which even when there may be some uncertainty concerning precisely what number of instances or deaths vaccination will stop, the truth that it’s extremely more likely to lower each, with few antagonistic results, is motivation sufficient to determine {that a} large-scale vaccination program is a good suggestion.

An engineer is all the time updating their image.

Susan Holmes

Engineers, Holmes factors out, are additionally superb at breaking issues down into important items, making use of rigorously chosen instruments, and optimizing for options underneath constraints. With a crew of engineers constructing a bridge, there’s a specialist in cement and a specialist in metal, a wind engineer and a structural engineer. “All of the completely different specialties work collectively,” she says.

For Zelner, the notion of epidemiology as an engineering self-discipline is one thing he  picked up from his father, a mechanical engineer who began his personal firm designing health-care services. Drawing on a childhood filled with constructing and fixing issues, his engineering mindset includes tinkering—refining a transmission mannequin, for example, in response to a transferring goal.

“Typically these issues require iterative options, the place you’re making modifications in response to what does or doesn’t work,” he says. “You proceed to replace what you’re doing as extra knowledge is available in and also you see the successes and failures of your strategy. To me, that’s very completely different—and higher suited to the complicated, non-stationary issues that outline public well being—than the form of static one-and-done picture lots of people have of educational science, the place you’ve gotten an enormous concept, take a look at it, and your result’s preserved in amber all the time.” 


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here