Selecting Your Subsequent Digital camera: Full Body, M43, APS-C, or Medium Format?


It’s an exquisite time to be contemplating a brand new digital camera. There are such a lot of choices for digital camera sort, options, costs, and sensor sizes that the alternatives can appear overwhelming. For this dialog, we’re going to focus (pardon the pun) on the sensor sizes you may contemplate on your subsequent digital camera.

Full disclosure: I {photograph} with a Fujifilm X-T4 digital camera, which is a mirrorless digital camera with APS-C sensor dimension. I’ve been utilizing the Fujifilm X collection cameras since 2014.

I’m going to base this text on the choices accessible in mirrorless cameras, as there are lots of extra choices accessible in addition to there are lots of extra deliberate future cameras for mirrorless than DSLR. Moreover, I’m going to restrict the scope of those comparisons to bodily properties and specs, as all of the at present accessible cameras will produce photos with unbelievable high quality. Presently, there are 4 completely different sensor dimension methods accessible, from smallest to largest they’re: micro four-thirds (M43), APS-C, full-frame, and medium format. Let’s begin with a comparability of the dimensions, weight, and value of the assorted methods.

Dimension, Weight, and Value Comparisons

For these comparisons, I’ll be utilizing the digital camera I personal, the Fujifilm X-T4 (26-megapixel), because the baseline digital camera. Clearly, these comparisons are removed from exhaustive. I attempted to seek out a few consultant cameras in every class as some extent of common comparability. Please watch the embedded video above for visible representations of those dimension comparisons.

Beginning with the smallest sensor dimension, M43 (17.3mm x 13mm) cameras supply the potential for drastically smaller cameras and lenses to work with the smaller sensor. For instance, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV (20.3MP) is 122mm broad versus 135mm for the X-T4 and it weighs 335 grams versus 526 grams for the Fuji. Moreover, it’s a lot inexpensive at $700 versus $1700 for the X-T4.

Not all micro four-thirds methods prioritize dimension, weight, and worth of their design. The Panasonic Lumix GH5 II (20.3MP) is a bit bigger bodily than the X-T4, and far heavier at 727 grams, whereas additionally retailing for a similar worth. The rationale for the additional dimension and value within the GH5 II is that this digital camera is engineered to excel at video and makes use of the additional house for system cooling throughout video recording classes.

Evaluating APS-C methods (23.6mm x 15.7mm), will discover a number of distinct choices accessible. Sony’s Alpha 6600 (26MP) rangefinder-style (versus the extra conventional DSLR look) provides a compact system that’s barely smaller in width and far smaller in top than the X-T4 for about $1400 and weighs about the identical at 503 grams. On the extra entry-level finish, Nikon provides the Z50 (20.9MP) in a DSLR fashion physique that’s barely smaller in width and top in comparison with the X-T4, and considerably lighter at 395 grams versus 526 grams for the X-T4 at a worth of $860.

Transferring as much as full-frame methods (36mm x 24mm) offers probably the most choices, by far. On the entry-level, Canon provides the EOS RP (26MP), which is about the identical width because the X-T4, whereas being smaller, lighter, and cheaper at $1,000. The subsequent comparability will use the Canon EOS R6 (20MP), which could be very comparable in dimension to the X-T4, however heavier at 680 grams, and dearer at $2500. Presently, Sony is the one producer to have a flagship full-frame mirrorless digital camera, and that’s the Alpha 1 (50MP). This digital camera is definitely a little bit bit smaller than the X-T4, however heavier at 737 grams and way more costly at $6500 USD. Canon has launched some particulars on its subsequent full-frame mirrorless, the R3, nevertheless it gained’t be the corporate’s flagship fairly but. It is going to be spectacular although, and the rumored specs embody a 24MP sensor, physique fashion and dimension just like the present 1DX MK III, and sure an identical weight of about 6000 grams and worth of over $6,000.

There’s one final sensor dimension to match: medium format (44mm x 33mm). Presently, solely Fujifilm and Hasselblad supply this sensor possibility for mirrorless customers. For this comparability, I’ll use the most recent Fujifilm medium format digital camera, the GFX 100S (100MP). With its significantly bigger sensor (about 180% bigger than APS-C), it’s wonderful how comparatively compact the GFX 100S is. It’s solely 15mm wider and 12mm taller than the X-T4 and about 300 grams heavier. Nonetheless, it’s considerably dearer at $6,900.

Crop Issue and Lenses

Any dialogue of a digital camera system should additionally embody a comparability of the lenses accessible for the system in addition to an understanding of crop issue. Crop issue is a operate of the relative dimension of the digital camera’s sensor to the “normal” sensor dimension, which is full-frame (36mm x 24mm) to find out the relative focal size and area of view of a lens.

A sensor that’s 50% smaller, as APS-C is, its crop issue is 1.5x. Which means a 24mm focal size on an APS-C sensor digital camera can have a (cropped) area of view of 150% in comparison with a full-frame, leading to a focal size “equal” of 36mm. Medium format works in the other way, as its sensor is bigger than full-frame, and its crop issue is 0.8x. The quick model is that is, the bigger the sensor, the “simpler” it’s to get a wider area of view, whereas a smaller sensor makes it “simpler” to get a narrower and extra telephoto area of view. Relying on the photographer and kind of desired photographs, each have benefits and drawbacks from a sensible standpoint.

The bodily specs and costs for lenses usually, however not all the time, improve with sensor dimension. There are far too many lens choices to match intimately right here, so I’ll evaluate a typical zoom lens of 24-70mm (full-frame) to offer a common thought of the variances in lens specs within the completely different sensor sizes. See the picture beneath for the dimensions, weight, and worth comparisons of those lenses.

M43’s Benefits

  • Lenses suitable throughout producers. Any of the lenses designed for this method will work on any digital camera from any producer.
  • Capable of be smaller and lighter.
  • Might be engineered for wonderful video capabilities on account of smaller sensors.
  • Lens sizes may be dramatically lowered.
  • Extra depth of area at a given aperture ends in using sooner apertures and shutter speeds and potential much less use of a tripod

M43’s Disadvantages

  • Much less alternative – solely two present main digital camera producers in Olympus and Panasonic (and maybe Blackmagic).
  • Usually poor efficiency at greater ISO settings with extra noise.
  • Not many broad angle lens choices (wider than 18mm full-frame equal).
  • Extra depth of area ends in much less background blur and topic separation if desired.
  • Future unsure. Olympus (now OM Digital) has been comparatively quiet on future plans. Panasonic has additionally been comparatively quiet about future plans for photography-focused M43 methods.

APS-C Benefits

  • Usually smaller, lighter, and cheaper than full-frame choices, particularly in relation to lenses.
  • Wonderful picture high quality, even at greater ISO settings.
  • Selection of established mirrorless methods which might be no less than 10 years previous.
  • 1.5X crop issue ends in extra ease in getting a narrower (extra telephoto) area of view.
  • Might be engineered for wonderful video capabilities on account of smaller sensors.

APS-C Disadvantages

  • Much less background blur at a given aperture, means much less topic separation.
  • Roughly one cease lack of excessive ISO efficiency in comparison with full-frame.
  • Much less alternative of mirrorless methods. Sony is rangefinder-style solely of their choices. Canon doesn’t supply an APS-C mirrorless system and lenses however has its M system that’s comparable in sensor dimension, however which has an unclear future.
  • Much less dimension, weight, and worth distinction than full-frame than up to now.

Full-Body Benefits

  • Mirrorless permits for dimension and weight reductions.
  • Wonderful picture high quality, together with at greater ISO settings.
  • Most choices for present cameras and lenses
  • Simpler to get a large angle area of view in lenses.
  • Simpler to get background blur and topic separation than smaller sensors.
  • Larger decision choices of 40 to 50MP.

Full-Body Disadvantages

  • Usually, bigger, heavier and dearer than smaller digital camera sensors.
  • I’ve bought nothing else to checklist right here…

Medium Format Benefits

  • Excessive-resolution sensors: 50 to 100MP
  • Distinctive picture high quality and element
  • Shallower depth of area than full body for extra topic separation from background

Medium Format Disadvantages

  • Usually, bigger, heavier, and dearer than smaller digital camera sensors.
  • Usually not engineered for video or fast-paced efficiency.
  • Fewer choices of methods and lenses.
  • Usually not engineered for low noise at excessive ISO settings.

Shopping for Solutions

After I began writing this text, I anticipated to say one thing like, “most folk ought to strongly contemplate APS-C for his or her subsequent digital camera” at this level. Nonetheless, after this analysis and with the brand new selections in each dimension and worth accessible in full-frame cameras, I believe for a lot of photographers, that is likely to be the system to beat. I’m undecided what system I’d select if beginning anew right now.

If doable, go to your native digital camera retailer and get your fingers on the cameras in your shortlist. An enormous a part of utilizing your digital camera is the way it feels to you, and the way simple it’s so that you can work together with the bodily controls and digital menu methods. One other benefit of your native digital camera retailer is speaking to somebody who actually is aware of the gear, and can ask you questions that may assist refine your selections and information you in a extra particular course.

It’s a Nice Time to Be Contemplating Your Subsequent Digital camera

Deciding in your subsequent digital camera may be a number of enjoyable. It additionally may be a number of stress. One technique to take care of the stress of so many choices and selections is to recollect: first, there are not any good cameras; second, any new digital camera will allow you to create wonderful photographs (in most conditions.); and third, there will probably be a brand new, “higher” digital camera launched quickly.

To paraphrase a well-known saying, “The very best time to purchase a digital camera was yesterday. The second greatest time is right now.”

Concerning the writer: Michael Sladek teaches digital pictures at Highline School close to Seattle, Washington. He enjoys dad jokes, doughnuts, and serving to others uncover the enjoyable of making photographs they love. Keep linked with Michael on his web site, YouTube channel, and Instagram.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here